Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 471
Filtrar
1.
Nature ; 627(8004): 612-619, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38480877

RESUMO

Less than 30% of people in Africa received a dose of the COVID-19 vaccine even 18 months after vaccine development1. Here, motivated by the observation that residents of remote, rural areas of Sierra Leone faced severe access difficulties2, we conducted an intervention with last-mile delivery of doses and health professionals to the most inaccessible areas, along with community mobilization. A cluster randomized controlled trial in 150 communities showed that this intervention with mobile vaccination teams increased the immunization rate by about 26 percentage points within 48-72 h. Moreover, auxiliary populations visited our community vaccination points, which more than doubled the number of inoculations administered. The additional people vaccinated per intervention site translated to an implementation cost of US $33 per person vaccinated. Transportation to reach remote villages accounted for a large share of total intervention costs. Therefore, bundling multiple maternal and child health interventions in the same visit would further reduce costs per person treated. Current research on vaccine delivery maintains a large focus on individual behavioural issues such as hesitancy. Our study demonstrates that prioritizing mobile services to overcome access difficulties faced by remote populations in developing countries can generate increased returns in terms of uptake of health services3.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Vacinação em Massa , Unidades Móveis de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Rural , Cobertura Vacinal , Criança , Humanos , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/métodos , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/organização & administração , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/economia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/provisão & distribuição , Unidades Móveis de Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Rural/organização & administração , Serra Leoa , Meios de Transporte/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/economia , Cobertura Vacinal/métodos , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Hesitação Vacinal , Vacinação em Massa/métodos , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Feminino , Adulto , Mães
2.
Ann Ist Super Sanita ; 59(1): 26-30, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36974701

RESUMO

Among the objectives of the WHO Global Vaccination Action Plan 2020-2025, there is the establishment, in all countries, of a National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (NITAG), an independent body with the aim of supporting and harmonising vaccination policies. Italy firstly established a NITAG in 2017; it contributed to the nation's immunization policies but fell short of its goal of becoming a true reference group. The newly appointed NITAG, made up of 28 independent experts, has the ambitious goal to promote the new National Immunization Prevention Plan (PNPV), to harmonise the current vaccination schedule with the anti-COVID-19 campaign, and to recover the vaccination coverage decline that occurred during the pandemic. The contact with the ECDC EU/EEA, the WHO Global NITAG networks, and all the national stakeholders needs to be reinforced in order to accomplish these aims. This paper describes the structure, organisation, and strategy of the new Italian NITAG.


Assuntos
Comitês Consultivos , COVID-19 , Programas de Imunização , Vacinação em Massa , Comitês Consultivos/história , Comitês Consultivos/organização & administração , Itália/epidemiologia , Programas de Imunização/ética , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Programas de Imunização/normas , Programas de Imunização/tendências , COVID-19/epidemiologia , História do Século XXI , Objetivos , Vacinação em Massa/ética , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Vacinação em Massa/normas , Vacinação em Massa/tendências , Conflito de Interesses , Humanos
5.
S Afr Med J ; 112(2): 13501, 2022 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35139989

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In South Africa (SA), >2.4 million cases of COVID­19 and >72 000 deaths were recorded between March 2020 and 1 August 2021, affecting the country's 52 districts to various extents. SA has committed to a COVID­19 vaccine roll-out in three phases, prioritising frontline workers, the elderly, people with comorbidities and essential workers. However, additional actions will be necessary to support efficient allocation and equitable access for vulnerable, access-constrained communities. OBJECTIVES: To explore various determinants of disease severity, resurgence risk and accessibility in order to aid an equitable, effective vaccine roll-out for SA that would maximise COVID­19 epidemic control by reducing the number of COVID­19 transmissions and resultant deaths, while at the same time reducing the risk of vaccine wastage. METHODS: For the 52 districts of SA, 26 COVID­19 indicators such as hospital admissions, deaths in hospital and mobility were ranked and hierarchically clustered with cases to identify which indicators can be used as indicators for severity or resurgence risk. Districts were then ranked using the estimated COVID­19 severity and resurgence risk to assist with prioritisation of vaccine roll-out. Urban and rural accessibility were also explored as factors that could limit vaccine roll-out in hard-to-reach communities. RESULTS: Highly populated urban districts showed the most cases. Districts such as Buffalo City, City of Cape Town and Nelson Mandela Bay experienced very severe first and second waves of the pandemic. Districts with high mobility, population size and density were found to be at highest risk of resurgence. In terms of accessibility, we found that 47.2% of the population are within 5 km of a hospital with ≥50 beds, and this percentage ranged from 87.0% in City of Cape Town to 0% in Namakwa district. CONCLUSIONS: The end goal is to provide equal distribution of vaccines proportional to district populations, which will provide fair protection. Districts with a high risk of resurgence and severity should be prioritised for vaccine roll-out, particularly the major metropolitan areas. We provide recommendations for allocations of different vaccine types for each district that consider levels of access, numbers of doses and cold-chain storage capability.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Hospitalização , Humanos , Gravidade do Paciente , África do Sul , Populações Vulneráveis
7.
Lancet ; 399(10325): 678-690, 2022 02 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35093206

RESUMO

Measles is a highly contagious, potentially fatal, but vaccine-preventable disease caused by measles virus. Symptoms include fever, maculopapular rash, and at least one of cough, coryza, or conjunctivitis, although vaccinated individuals can have milder or even no symptoms. Laboratory diagnosis relies largely on the detection of specific IgM antibodies in serum, dried blood spots, or oral fluid, or the detection of viral RNA in throat or nasopharyngeal swabs, urine, or oral fluid. Complications can affect many organs and often include otitis media, laryngotracheobronchitis, pneumonia, stomatitis, and diarrhoea. Neurological complications are uncommon but serious, and can occur during or soon after the acute disease (eg, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis) or months or even years later (eg, measles inclusion body encephalitis and subacute sclerosing panencephalitis). Patient management mainly involves supportive therapy, such as vitamin A supplementation, monitoring for and treatment of secondary bacterial infections with antibiotics, and rehydration in the case of severe diarrhoea. There is no specific antiviral therapy for the treatment of measles, and disease control largely depends on prevention. However, despite the availability of a safe and effective vaccine, measles is still endemic in many countries and causes considerable morbidity and mortality, especially among children in resource-poor settings. The low case numbers reported in 2020, after a worldwide resurgence of measles between 2017 and 2019, have to be interpreted cautiously, owing to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on disease surveillance. Disrupted vaccination activities during the pandemic increase the potential for another resurgence of measles in the near future, and effective, timely catch-up vaccination campaigns, strong commitment and leadership, and sufficient resources will be required to mitigate this threat.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Doenças Endêmicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/organização & administração , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Doenças Endêmicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Vacinação em Massa/normas , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/imunologia , Sarampo/virologia , Vírus do Sarampo/imunologia , Vírus do Sarampo/patogenicidade , Pandemias/prevenção & controle
10.
Dig Liver Dis ; 54(2): 237-242, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33926816

RESUMO

Although Italy has been on track for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) elimination since 2019, it fell off track due to the decrease in the number of treated patients. HCV elimination in Italy will be possible if immediate action is taken. A health policy was implemented beginning in 2021, consisting of screening among key populations and birth cohorts (1969-1989), estimated to have a high prevalence of undiagnosed individuals. The active screening requires regional governance that manages the processes' complexity integrating a well-organized network between territory assistance and hospital to achieve an effective HCV care cascade. This document aims to support the regional decision-making process by defining paths for screening and linkage-to-care. Implementing active screening strategies beyond a risk-based approach is required as a General Practitioners' task. Simplified paths must be drawn for the key populations screening. The infrastructure built for COVID-19 vaccination could be used also for HCV screening. According to a multidisciplinary care delivery, screening should be supplemented with rapid linkage-to-care and treatment of newly diagnosed patients. The realization of the proactive screening during the first two years is vital because it will define the tracks for the whole HCV cost-effective screening of 1948-1988 birth cohorts in Italy.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Erradicação de Doenças/organização & administração , Política de Saúde , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administração , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Hepatite C/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia
13.
Am J Public Health ; 111(10): 1776-1779, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34499538

RESUMO

We describe a large-scale collaborative intervention of practice measures and COVID-19 vaccine administration to college students in the priority 1b group, which included Black or Indigenous persons and other persons of color. In February 2021, at this decentralized vaccine distribution site at Montana State University in Bozeman, we administered 806 first doses and 776 second doses by implementing an interprofessional effort with personnel from relevant university units, including facilities management, student health, communications, administration, and academic units (e.g., nursing, medicine, medical assistant program, and engineering). (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print September 9, 2021:1776-1779. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306435).


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Universidades/organização & administração , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/etnologia , Docentes , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Montana/epidemiologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudantes , Adulto Jovem
15.
World J Emerg Surg ; 16(1): 46, 2021 09 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34507603

RESUMO

On January 2020, the WHO Director General declared that the outbreak constitutes a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The world has faced a worldwide spread crisis and is still dealing with it. The present paper represents a white paper concerning the tough lessons we have learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, an international and heterogenous multidisciplinary panel of very differentiated people would like to share global experiences and lessons with all interested and especially those responsible for future healthcare decision making. With the present paper, international and heterogenous multidisciplinary panel of very differentiated people would like to share global experiences and lessons with all interested and especially those responsible for future healthcare decision making.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Saúde Global , Pandemias , Pesquisa Biomédica , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Política de Saúde , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Política , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Telemedicina/organização & administração
17.
Med J Aust ; 215(9): 427-432, 2021 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34477236

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination by vaccine type, age group eligibility, vaccination strategy, and population coverage. DESIGN: Epidemiologic modelling to assess the final size of a COVID-19 epidemic in Australia, with vaccination program (Pfizer, AstraZeneca, mixed), vaccination strategy (vulnerable first, transmitters first, untargeted), age group eligibility threshold (5 or 15 years), population coverage, and pre-vaccination effective reproduction number ( Reffv¯ ) for the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant as factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers of SARS-CoV-2 infections; cumulative hospitalisations, deaths, and years of life lost. RESULTS: Assuming Reffv¯ = 5, the current mixed vaccination program (vaccinating people aged 60 or more with the AstraZeneca vaccine and people under 60 with the Pfizer vaccine) will not achieve herd protection unless population vaccination coverage reaches 85% by lowering the vaccination eligibility age to 5 years. At Reffv¯ = 3, the mixed program could achieve herd protection at 60-70% population coverage and without vaccinating 5-15-year-old children. At Reffv¯ = 7, herd protection is unlikely to be achieved with currently available vaccines, but they would still reduce the number of COVID-19-related deaths by 85%. CONCLUSION: Vaccinating vulnerable people first is the optimal policy when population vaccination coverage is low, but vaccinating more socially active people becomes more important as the Reffv¯ declines and vaccination coverage increases. Assuming the most plausible Reffv¯ of 5, vaccinating more than 85% of the population, including children, would be needed to achieve herd protection. Even without herd protection, vaccines are highly effective in reducing the number of deaths.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Imunidade Coletiva , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Austrália/epidemiologia , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/virologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Simulação por Computador , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Vacinação em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Imunológicos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Cobertura Vacinal/organização & administração , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
18.
Am J Public Health ; 111(10): 1780-1783, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34529451

RESUMO

Individuals with serious mental illness are particularly vulnerable to COVID-19. The New York State (NYS) Office of Mental Health implemented patient and staff rapid testing, quarantining, and vaccination to limit COVID-19 spread in 23 state-operated psychiatric hospitals between November 2020 and February 2021. COVID-19 infection rates in inpatients and staff decreased by 96% and 71%, respectively, and the NYS population case rate decreased by 6%. Repeated COVID-19 testing and vaccination should be priority interventions for state-operated psychiatric hospitals. (Am J Public Health. 2021;111(10):1780-1783. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306444).


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Hospitais Psiquiátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação em Massa/organização & administração , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Teste para COVID-19 , Humanos , New York/epidemiologia , Quarentena , SARS-CoV-2 , Populações Vulneráveis
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...